Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2763.2x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
  • Around 38% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 331
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 127
  • 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3239 vs 1092
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1153
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1153
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 November 2018 vs 2 October 2012
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel/s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 740 vs 331
PassMark - G2D Mark 185 vs 127
Geekbench - OpenCL 3239 vs 1092
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1720 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1720 vs 1153

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2177 vs 1772
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2177 vs 1772
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 192 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2177 vs 1772
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2177 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
740
331
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
185
127
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3239
1092
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1772
2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1772
2177
Name Intel UHD Graphics 615 AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 740 331
PassMark - G2D Mark 185 127
Geekbench - OpenCL 3239 1092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 221.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.34
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.383
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1256
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1720 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1772 2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1256
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1720 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1772 2177

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 615 AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 3
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Scrapper
Launch date 7 November 2018 2 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1390 1397
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $67

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 760 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops 291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 32 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 192
Pixel fill rate 3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel/s 9.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,303 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 System Shared
Shared memory Yes

Technologies

Quick Sync