Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 10606.1x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- 8.5x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 47.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 512 MB
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 741 vs 123
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1772 vs 782
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1772 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 25 February 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 741 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 594 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 40 vs 24
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 185
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 594 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 40 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 185 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 741 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3255 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 615 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | RV620 |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 25 February 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1390 | 802 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 594 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 24 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
Shared memory | Yes | yes |
Memory bandwidth | 6.34 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 792 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |