Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and ATI Radeon IGP 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 160 MHz
- 6.6x more boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 160 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 180 nm
- 185x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 4
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 5 October 2002 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 180 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 vs 101 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | ATI Radeon IGP 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 101 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 615 | ATI Radeon IGP 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | RS320 |
Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 5 October 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1357 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 160 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 160 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 180 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 7.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
Shared memory | Yes | yes |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |