Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Intel HD Graphics P3000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 287
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 82
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1772 vs 1300
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1772 vs 1300

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P3000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	740 287
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	185 82
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 1300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 1300

Compare specifications (specs)