Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and AMD Radeon R5 M430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 1223.3x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1313 vs 1087
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1313 vs 1087
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1461 vs 1157
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1461 vs 1157
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 898 vs 649
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 vs 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 vs 1157 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 vs 649 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5059 vs 3300
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2212 vs 1633
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2212 vs 1633
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5059 vs 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 vs 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 vs 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3300 | 5059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 2212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 2212 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 | 516 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | Exo |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1218 | 1173 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 617 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
