Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and AMD Radeon R8 M365DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1313 vs 1229
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1313 vs 1229
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1461 vs 1370
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1461 vs 1370
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 197
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 898 vs 602
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 3 June 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 vs 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 vs 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 vs 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 vs 1370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 vs 197 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 vs 602 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 3301
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2017 vs 1633
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2017 vs 1633
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 vs 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2017 vs 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2017 vs 1633 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3301 | 5601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 2017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 2017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 238 | 197 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 602 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | Meso |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 3 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1218 | 1266 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 617 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
