Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R6 M255DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 855 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 605
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 116
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1055
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1055
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 7 January 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 vs 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 vs 116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1055 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 576 vs 24
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 vs 4671
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1596
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 vs 3309
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1596
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 576 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 vs 4671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 116 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 | 17123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3563 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3563 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Jet |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 7 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1219 | 1190 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 780 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay |