Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 1093
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 216
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1830
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 722
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3227
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1830
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 722
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3227
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 825 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1243 vs 1093
PassMark - G2D Mark 302 vs 216
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 vs 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 vs 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 vs 3227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 vs 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 vs 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 vs 3227

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350

  • 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
  • Around 69% better floating-point performance: 779.5 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
  • Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5897 vs 4671
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 24
Floating-point performance 779.5 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5897 vs 4671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1243
1093
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
302
216
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4671
5897
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3227
Name Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon R7 M350
PassMark - G3D Mark 1243 1093
PassMark - G2D Mark 302 216
Geekbench - OpenCL 4671 5897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 3227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 1830
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 722
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 3227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 421

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon R7 M350

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 3.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT2 Meso
Launch date 1 September 2017 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1219 1190
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 825 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops 779.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 384
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s 24.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million
Compute units 6

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 16 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore