Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 1093
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 216
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1830
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 722
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3227
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1830
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 722
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3227
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 vs 1093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 vs 216 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 3227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 3227 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 779.5 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5897 vs 4671
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5897 vs 4671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 M350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 1093 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 | 5897 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1830 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 M350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Meso |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1219 | 1190 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 24.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |