Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 3x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 6x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 135
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 287
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1398
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1398

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 36 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1243 135
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 287
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1398

Compare specifications (specs)