Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and ATI Radeon 9800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 331 MHz
- 21.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 51.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1245 vs 24
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 331 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1245 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 vs 131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon 9800 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1245 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4665 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.682 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.452 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon 9800 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 8 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | R350 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1220 | 1217 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 331 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 1.324 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | Floppy | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 9.28 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 580 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |