Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel Iris Graphics 540
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel Iris Graphics 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3158
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 3158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 3158 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1257 vs 1245
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 302
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6253 vs 4665
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 1870
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 1870
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1257 vs 1245 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 vs 302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6253 vs 4665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 vs 1870 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 540
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1245 | 1257 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 322 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4665 | 6253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.682 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.452 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Skylake GT3e |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1220 | 1057 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory type | eDRAM | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |