Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1244 vs 546
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4671 vs 1162
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 vs 3.257
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 668
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1286
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1708
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 668
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1286
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1708
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 15 May 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1244 vs 546 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 vs 1162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 vs 3.257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 1708 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 302
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 vs 302 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 615
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1244 | 546 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 | 1162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | 3.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1708 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce 615 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1219 | 1294 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 660 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 126.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 5.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |