Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 941 MHz
• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 1013
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 151
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 vs 22.344
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 166.907
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 vs 1.225
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.414 vs 19.899

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 57% better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4974 vs 4670
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.246 vs 29.514
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3309
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1243 1013
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4670 4974
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.89 22.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.911 166.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.785 1.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.414 19.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.514 84.246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3356

Compare specifications (specs)