Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 51.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 24
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 265
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 22 December 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 vs 265 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 425 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 425 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 265 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4670 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Curie |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | MCP51 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 22 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1219 | 640 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCI |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |