Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD FirePro W5000
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD FirePro W5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 393.9x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 23.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3716
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 7 August 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2974 vs 1619
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 568 vs 388
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10275 vs 5845
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4308 vs 2429
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3309
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4308 vs 2429
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 192 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2974 vs 1619 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 568 vs 388 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10275 vs 5845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4308 vs 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4308 vs 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1619 | 2974 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 568 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5845 | 10275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD FirePro W5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 2021 | 7 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 663 | 556 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Length | 183 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 730 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDFirePro D500
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
