Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD Radeon HD 8870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 503.2x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3702
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3702
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1638 vs 1619
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 vs 388
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9065 vs 5846
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1638 vs 1619 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 vs 388 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9065 vs 5846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1619 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5846 | 9065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.097 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.848 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Venus |
| Launch date | 2021 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 663 | 726 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Compute units | 24 | 10 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 730 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDFirePro D500
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
