Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 825.4x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 vs 2097
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3219 vs 3127
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 6862
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 2097
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3219 vs 3127
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 6862
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 6862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 6862 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7890 vs 6690
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7890 vs 6690 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1738 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6690 | 7890 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 6862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 6862 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Oland |
Launch date | 2021 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 597 | 825 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |