Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1040x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1737 vs 763
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 vs 1643
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3356
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 1643
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 vs 763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 256
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 348
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3314 vs 3219
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3314 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3314 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3314 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 512.081 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Broadway |
Launch date | 2021 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 595 | 847 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDMI 1.3a |