Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 203.9x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 6703
- 24.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 117
- 29.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3219 vs 108.2
- 92.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 119.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 vs 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 vs 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 119.7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 1536 vs 256
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 2899
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 3219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 119.7 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 8 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 599 | 886 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIFirePro M7740
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
