Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 3274
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 3274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 3274 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2524 vs 1887
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2524 vs 1887
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 vs 1887 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Polaris |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | Lexa |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 884 | 812 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
