Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 3114
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 3114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 20 February 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 3114 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9x more pipelines: 288 vs 32
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1887
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1887
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 736 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 288 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.232 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.114 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 20 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 884 | 967 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 288 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 35.33 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 91.87 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
