Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 41 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 2490
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 2490
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3329
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 41 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1887
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1887
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1887 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3329 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2235 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Maxwell |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 884 | 974 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
