Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 128x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2221 vs 1617
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.49 vs 12.318
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.089 vs 1.234
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2221 vs 1617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 vs 12.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 vs 1.234 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 840 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 33.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 24
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 330
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 748.068 vs 387.561
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.768 vs 24.713
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 vs 37.743
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3127 vs 2010
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 vs 2273
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3019
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3127 vs 2010
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 vs 2273
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3019
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 840 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 vs 330 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 748.068 vs 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.768 vs 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 vs 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3127 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 vs 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3127 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 vs 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3019 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2221 | 1617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5645 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 12.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 748.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 1.234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 28.768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 121.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 3534 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 3534 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Place in performance rating | 1072 | 857 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | |
Code name | Barts | |
Launch date | 4 April 2011 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $64.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.40 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 840 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 800 |
Floating-point performance | 1,344.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin |