Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2194 vs 1590
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 vs 1564
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 32 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 vs 1590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 vs 1564 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 329
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 5645
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 2010
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3019
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 2010
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3019
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 329 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 vs 5645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3019 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 | 1590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5645 | 7012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Place in performance rating | 1072 | 851 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 |