Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630

• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 863 MHz
• 64x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2194 vs 1993
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 329 vs 288
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.49 vs 8.832
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.089 vs 0.731
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.713 vs 19.952

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7103 vs 5645
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 387.561
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 vs 37.743
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2010
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2273
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3019
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2010
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2273
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3019

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2194 1993
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	329 288
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5645 7103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.49 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	387.561 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.089 0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.713 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.743 43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2010 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2273 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3019 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2010 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2273 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3019 3333

Compare specifications (specs)