Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630

• 2.4x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 256x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 512 MB
• 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2194 vs 218
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 329 vs 272
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3019 vs 1247
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3019 vs 1247

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

• Around 43% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 350 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2194 218
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	329 272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3019 1247
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3019 1247

Compare specifications (specs)