Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and AMD Radeon R9 290X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 26.5x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 38.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 2021 vs 24 June 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s vs 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X2
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 22x more pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 256
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 256 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.441 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics P750 | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 2021 | 24 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 457 | 282 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 115.2 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 921.6 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 2x 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 28.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s | 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 580 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,632 gflops | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |