Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 4.9x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 5.904 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.111 vs 4.403
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 131.239
  • 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 69
  • 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1480 vs 405
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 24 March 2014
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 48
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.111 vs 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 313.603 vs 131.239
PassMark - G2D Mark 267 vs 69
PassMark - G3D Mark 1480 vs 405

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
23.111
4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
313.603
131.239
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
267
69
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1480
405
Name Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 810M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.111 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 313.603 131.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.708
PassMark - G2D Mark 267 69
PassMark - G3D Mark 1480 405
Geekbench - OpenCL 1644
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3035

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Fermi 2.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 GF117
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 24 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1199 1434
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 48
Texture fill rate 28.80 5.904 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
Core clock speed 738 MHz
Floating-point performance 141.7 gflops
Transistor count 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3