Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 889 MHz
  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 9.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 8.572
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 151.304
  • Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 0.808
  • Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 vs 13.943
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 128
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1479 vs 636
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 1 April 2013
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 889 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 9.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.059 vs 8.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 313.603 vs 151.304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.345 vs 0.808
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.728 vs 13.943
PassMark - G2D Mark 269 vs 128
PassMark - G3D Mark 1479 vs 636

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 28.67
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 39.301 vs 28.67

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
23.059
8.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
313.603
151.304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.345
0.808
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.728
13.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
28.67
39.301
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
269
128
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1479
636
Name Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.059 8.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 313.603 151.304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.345 0.808
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.728 13.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.67 39.301
PassMark - G2D Mark 269 128
PassMark - G3D Mark 1479 636
Geekbench - OpenCL 3550
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2519

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Kepler 2.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 GK208
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 1 April 2013
Place in performance rating 1186 1456
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 889 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 28.80 9.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Core clock speed 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 441.6 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus