Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 889 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 8.572
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 151.304
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 0.808
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 vs 13.943
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 128
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1479 vs 636
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 889 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 vs 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 vs 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 vs 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 vs 13.943 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 vs 128 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 vs 636 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 28.67
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 vs 28.67 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 | 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 | 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 | 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 | 13.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 | 39.301 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 128 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3550 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GK208 |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1186 | 1456 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 889 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |