Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics

NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
2.7x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 10.56 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 5.068
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 229.562
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 0.635
Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 vs 11.384
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.67 vs 19.696
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 188
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1479 vs 627

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 Aug 2019 vs 1 June 2012
Texture fill rate	28.80 vs 10.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.059 vs 5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.603 vs 229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.345 vs 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.728 vs 11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.67 vs 19.696
PassMark - G2D Mark	269 vs 188
PassMark - G3D Mark	1479 vs 627

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.059

5.068

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.603

229.562

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.345

0.635

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.728

11.384

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.67

19.696

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

269

188

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1479

627

Name	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.059	5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.603	229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.345	0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.728	11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.67	19.696
PassMark - G2D Mark	269	188
PassMark - G3D Mark	1479	627
Geekbench - OpenCL		2386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		2282

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Fermi
Code name	Comet Lake GT2	GF108
Launch date	21 Aug 2019	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1186	1427
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Texture fill rate	28.80	10.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Core clock speed		660 MHz
Floating-point performance		253.4 gflops
Transistor count		585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus