Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 13.46 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 192 vs 72
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 70
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1479 vs 467
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 15 June 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 13.46 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 72 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 vs 70 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 vs 467 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 70 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 | 467 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1450 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1450 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 926 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GT215 |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1186 | 1504 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 13.46 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Core clock speed | 561 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 162 gflops | |
Transistor count | 727 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 35.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |