NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs ATI FireGL V8600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K240Q and ATI FireGL V8600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 8.7x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 320
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1736 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2541 vs 839
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 688 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1736 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2541 vs 839 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8600
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 159 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 212
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 159 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K240Q | ATI FireGL V8600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2541 | 839 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 406 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6935 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6935 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K240Q | ATI FireGL V8600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | R600 |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $1,899 |
Place in performance rating | 489 | 363 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 688 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 11.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 159 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1736 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |