NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 850 MTexel / s
• 512x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 6
• 480x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 16.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 213
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1039
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 160

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3516 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	160 456
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 1039

Compare specifications (specs)