NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs AMD Radeon R9 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5203 vs 4722
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,496 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 vs 4722 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 311
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6096 vs 5460
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6096 vs 5460
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3526
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3526
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 vs 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 vs 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | AMD Radeon R9 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 | 4722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5460 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5460 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | AMD Radeon R9 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 479 | 406 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 221 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |