NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 618 vs 464
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8909 vs 7400
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8909 vs 7400
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 14 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 3,226 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8909 vs 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8909 vs 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4096 vs 3884
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82941 vs 27798
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4096 vs 3884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3709 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82941 vs 27798 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3884 | 4096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 | 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8909 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8909 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27798 | 82941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 14 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 350 | 409 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 176 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q with others
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
