NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and ATI Radeon X1300 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 12.5x more texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 782 vs 84
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 1 November 2006 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 vs 84 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 313 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | R500 |
Code name | GK208 | RV516 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 1 November 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 514 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |