NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 928 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 783.4 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1293 vs 1013
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 151
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5494 vs 4974
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.565 vs 22.344
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 vs 1987
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 vs 1987
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1293 vs 1013 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5494 vs 4974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 vs 22.344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 vs 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 vs 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.907 vs 165.338
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.225 vs 1.09
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3577
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3577
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 vs 165.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 vs 1.09 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3577 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce 930M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1293 | 1013 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5494 | 4974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | 22.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | 166.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | 1.225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM108 | GM108 |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1115 | 1203 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | 941 MHz |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 22.58 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 33 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
GeForce Experience |