NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- 3x better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 vs 401
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3262
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 October 2015 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 255
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 vs 255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3262 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 945M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | M96 |
Launch date | 27 October 2015 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 952 | 776 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |