NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 85.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 6
• 93.5x better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 9.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 vs 213
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1039
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 28.5x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 255

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2108 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 456
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 1039

Compare specifications (specs)