NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 512 vs 40
- 9.2x better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 vs 1191
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 vs 5081
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 vs 2095
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3285
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 vs 2095
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 October 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 vs 1191 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 vs 5081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 | 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 399 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 5081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | GM107 | Haswell GT3e |
| Launch date | 27 October 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 952 | 644 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 945M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840A
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDFirePro W4100
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
