NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A vs AMD FireStream 9170
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A and AMD FireStream 9170 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.8 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 512.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 668 vs 647
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 August 2013 vs 8 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 512.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 668 vs 647 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9170
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 300
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 vs 300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9170
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A | AMD FireStream 9170 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | 493 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 668 | 647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A | AMD FireStream 9170 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK208 | RV670 |
Launch date | 26 August 2013 | 8 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 507 | 289 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 512.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 12.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 666 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |