NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD FirePro W4190M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 825 MHz
• Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 2.8x more texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 1148
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 180
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 284.018
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.417
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 1704
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2529
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 1704
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 2529

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 16790
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3359
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4190M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4462 1148
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 180
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16790 23384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 284.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 1.417
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 2529
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3889
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 2529
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3889

Compare specifications (specs)