NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 2231
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16790 vs 10003
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3175
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 vs 2231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16790 vs 10003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3175 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 292
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 292 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 2231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 509 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16790 | 10003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3175 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2083 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | GP106B | Skylake GT4e |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 642 | 665 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 210S
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro M5100
