NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs ATI FireGL V8650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 11.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6315 vs 550
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 vs 637
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 688 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6315 vs 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 vs 637 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650
- 248x more memory clock speed: 1736 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1736 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI FireGL V8650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6315 | 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | 637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20100 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI FireGL V8650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP107 | R600 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 14 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $2,799 |
| Place in performance rating | 473 | 405 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 688 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1736 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
