NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs ATI FirePro V8700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and ATI FirePro V8700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s
- Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6315 vs 1539
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 vs 527
- 21.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 152.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 11 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 151 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6315 vs 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 vs 527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 152.6 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8700
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- 485.7x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8543 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8543 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8700
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6315 | 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | 527 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20100 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 8543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 152.6 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI FirePro V8700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP107 | RV770 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 11 September 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 473 | 430 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 3400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
