NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 7x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6314 vs 628
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 12 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6314 vs 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 397 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
- 228.6x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6314 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2338 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP107 | R600 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 12 December 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 376 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 118.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |