NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 286 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6314 vs 1309
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 565
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 12 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 286 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6314 vs 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2x 800 vs 768
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,120.0 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
- 514.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops vs 2,138 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6314 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2338 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP107 | R700 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 12 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $550 |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 438 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 286 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |