NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and ATI Radeon HD 5830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 44.8 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6315 vs 1734
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 399
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 25 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 44.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6315 vs 1734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 399 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5830
- Around 46% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 768
- 571.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Pipelines | 1120 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5830
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI Radeon HD 5830 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6315 | 1734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20098 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | ATI Radeon HD 5830 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GP107 | Cypress |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 25 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 537 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 44.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 282 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity |