NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1013 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6314 vs 6226
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 423
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20112 vs 18998
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 251.464
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7602
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2749
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3093
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7602
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2749
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3093
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 October 2016 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed 1392 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed 1392 MHz vs 1013 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6314 vs 6226
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 vs 423
Geekbench - OpenCL 20112 vs 18998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 vs 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336 vs 3093

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

  • Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 1,280 vs 768
  • Around 17% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
  • 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 75.758
  • Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 vs 843.503
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 5.071
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.443 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1,280 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 81.104 vs 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.338 vs 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.157 vs 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 68.443 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6314
6226
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
650
423
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
20112
18998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
75.758
81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
843.503
1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.071
6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.676
68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
301.168
251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8496
7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3687
2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3336
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8496
7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3687
2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3336
3093
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 6314 6226
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 423
Geekbench - OpenCL 20112 18998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3093
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2338 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP107 GM204
Launch date 25 October 2016 18 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Place in performance rating 473 547
Price now $159.99
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1392 MHz 1013 MHz
Core clock speed 1392 MHz 975 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops 2,496 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Pipelines 768 1,280
Texture fill rate 66.82 GTexel / s 78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 5,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
G-SYNC support
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB / s 160 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7 GB/s 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus