NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5371 vs 2892
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 vs 26.189
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 798.239
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 4.223
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 45.294
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 240.395
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 17 December 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5371 vs 2892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 vs 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 vs 798.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 vs 4.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 vs 45.294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 vs 240.395 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 356
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 vs 356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5371 | 2892 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 356 | 559 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 798.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 4.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 45.294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 240.395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 17 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 519 | 555 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |